In a significant ruling, the apex court recalled its own verdict on the appointment of central, state information commissioners across the country
NEW DELHI, September 3: The Supreme Court on Tuesday recalled an order and admitted that it committed a "mistake of law" by directing that only sitting or retired high court chief justices or an apex court judge could head the central and state information commissions.
A bench of justices A K Patnaik and A K Sikri withdrew its order of
September 13, last year in which a slew of directions were passed
pertaining to appointment of information commissioners.
"It was mistake of law. We recall the directions," the bench said
while reading out the operative portion of its judgement on a petition
filed by the Centre seeking review of its last year's order. The Centre
had sought review of the apex court's verdict, saying it is against the
provisions of the transparency law.
The apex court, in its judgement last year, had said that like
other quasi judicial bodies, people from judicial background be also
appointed as members of the central and state information commissions
and this should be done after consulting the CJI and chief justices of
the respective high courts.
The court had directed the government to amend RTI Act for it.
"Chief Information Commissioner at the Centre or state level shall only
be a person who is or has been a chief justice of the high court or a
judge of the Supreme Court of India," the court had said.
The bench had passed the order on a PIL challenging section 12 and
15 of the Right to Information (RTI) Act, 2005, enumerating the
qualifications needed for the appointment of members of the commissions.
The bench had, however, refused to quash the sections but asked the
government to modify them so that people from judicial background are
also preferred for the posts.
Source & Credit: Deccan Chronicle
No comments:
Post a Comment